| 
 
 1396| 16
 
 | 
[硬盘/SSD] msata好像比普通sata速度慢不少啊|自动提醒阅读字号:             
  | 
| 
 提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽 
 | |
| 
 签名被屏蔽 
 | 
|
  | ||
  | ||
| 
 X200 P8600(3.15G)  4G 128SSD WIN7 64 
 | 
||
  | ||
| 
 X230FHD(13.3 1920*1080) coreboot i7-3615QE 8G*2 三星1T+512G SSD 
 | 
||
  | ||
| 
 X61, X62, X200, X201, X240, T450S, T570, T580,,,.... 
 | 
||
  | ||
| 
 L670/NV160WUM-NH0+SN520+1100+HK4R X330/P130ZFZ-BH2+S3610+LMT-19nmBGA X210s(3001)/HV121WX6-110+SM951a+SM841+840pro X200/HV121WX5-120+S3710 
used-X301:SU9800/SU9900/SP9600,X201:i7-620M,X201s:i7-640LM,X201T:i7-620LM,X220:i7-2640M,X230:i5-3210M/i5-3320M,X330:i5-3320M,T430s:i7-3520M,X1C:i7-3667U  | 
||
 点评
回复@wj321 : 是的 X230还不改走线纯粹就是懒 
 
回复@ivex : K29设计和X220不同,X220的走线导致Sata3.0不稳定,后来各个方案引出Msata都出现卡顿现象,联想保守设计没错。只不过X230还这样做就不可理解了 
 
回复@wj321 : 关键是同代的K29另一个3.0就是给msata了。就因为有个底座,就把3.0给底座导致msata只有2.0纯粹是制杖设计 
 
回复@ivex : 而且X220当年那个插槽主流是3G,出厂带Msata的机型似乎都没有 
 
回复@ivex : 当年Msata还没有取代Sata固态成为主流 
 
原来如此那是我记错了。这就更离谱了,本身有一个2.5是3.0的了,光驱位硬盘方便拆卸多半是机械硬盘,却把本来应该给msata的3.0给抢走了,这tm太离谱 
 
 | ||
  | ||
  | ||
| 
 🖥M800t i5-12490F, Radeon 520, 64GB, 2TB 3400, 10TB WD 5K4 OEM 
💻W520 FHD: i7-2760QM, Quadro2000M, 24GB, 960GB Ultra II | W500 WUXGA CCFL: X9100, V5700, 8GB, 512GB HG6 💻T400 WXGA+ LED: T9800, HD3470, 8GB, Non-Disk | T61p 15.4'WSXGA+ CCFL: T9500, QuadroFX570M, 8GB, 512GB HG6  | 
||
  | ||
| 
 🖥M800t i5-12490F, Radeon 520, 64GB, 2TB 3400, 10TB WD 5K4 OEM 
💻W520 FHD: i7-2760QM, Quadro2000M, 24GB, 960GB Ultra II | W500 WUXGA CCFL: X9100, V5700, 8GB, 512GB HG6 💻T400 WXGA+ LED: T9800, HD3470, 8GB, Non-Disk | T61p 15.4'WSXGA+ CCFL: T9500, QuadroFX570M, 8GB, 512GB HG6  | 
||
  | ||
| 
 MacBook Air 联想拯救者R7000 
IBM T43P(U屏,原主板卒,已换T43主板) ThinkPad T60P(U屏) T410i X230 W530  | 
||
Powered by Discuz! X3.5 © 2001-2023 Comsenz Inc
GMT+8, 2025-11-4 20:10 , Processed in 0.104919 second(s), 44 queries , Gzip On, OPcache On.